It seems that Debbie Rowe, the biological mother of Michael Jackson’s children, has announced to the world that Michael was not the father her children. This wasn’t leaked to the tabloid press by someone else, she told them.
According to the Sydney Morning Herald,
Rowe reportedly then gave away her parental rights to the children in exchange for a $US8.4million payout over nine years.
She apparently went on to say,
“I was no good. I don’t want these children in my life. My children are my animals now.”
So… the man they’ve known as their father is dead. Their mother publicly states she doesn’t want them and that she gave them away for millions of dollars. Then she announces their father wasn’t really their father.
As I was thinking about how devastated these children must already feel and how much worse it will be because of her heartless statements, I recalled comments I had read in the past made by Elise Sutton on the subject of female superiority:
“I feel that I am a bit of an expert based on my years of study, observation and participation.”
“Once I learned about the natures of both men and women and once I learned about the natural dominance and supremacy of women over men..”
“The truth is that women are the superior gender and that once a woman unleashes her dominant power, no man will be able to stand up to her.”
Umm.. yeah. Ok.
I don’t think so.
To say women are superior to men makes as much sense to me as the long held belief by many that men are superior to women. There are plenty of people of both genders who prove this wrong. There are some things *individuals” do better than others, but I think it’s devaluing to people to say that everyone of a certain gender is better than they are.
I’m not in control because I am superior to him. I am in control because he chooses to surrender and I choose to take control.
(Note: The link between Rowe and Sutton’s comments is strictly mine. My mind often goes to the Female/Male Superiority issue whenever I read about people who completely disprove the theory.)