Archive for January, 2010

Gender Bashing, Discrimination, and a Little Bit of Randomness

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

It’s been a busy week so I haven’t had time to post or respond to emails nearly as much as I wanted. Surely time must be a woman, because if it were a man I think I could persuade him to be a little more relaxed with his rules. Thirty hours in a day? Oh my, yes! Such a good boy.. that’s precisely what I need. Could you arrange with the Sandman to be a bit more frugal with his magical dust so I can sleep less and feel better than I do now? Thank you! I am so very pleased :)

Ah well, back to the real world.

At the moment I’m sitting in a warm car waiting for Richard to pick up a few things in the pharmacy. Since we had 6 inches of snow on the ground when we awakened and much deeper drifts along the driveway, etc., we pretty much stayed indoors yesterday. When he mentioned getting out, I didn’t even wait to see where he was going – what did it matter? It was the great outdoors! Ok, the great parking lot.

It’s interesting to sit and watch people when they don’t know anyone is paying attention. A 50-something man just let the door slam in the face of an elderly woman, leaving a visibly indignant 20ish man to assist her. People say today’s young people have no manners (something that people have been saying for decades or longer I am sure), but that certainly doesn’t always seem to be the case.

Speaking of misperceptions about people…

I’ve been thinking about discrimination a lot this week. Someone I spoke with recently said he didn’t believe women were really treated differently than men in the work place. Just wondering.. do you find that to be the case? I admit, I have worked doing private duty nursing care for the past several years, but I can’t imagine things have changed that much in such a short time. More on that in another post, but I do hope you’ll share your insight in the meantime.

On a related note, do you find the people around you frequently gender bash?  Perhaps it would be interesting  to take note this week to determine just how often we are exposed to gender bias and even hatred.   If you are frequently exposed,  do you believe it has an impact on you?

More soon.

~ Lady Julia

Banning Books

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

According to CBC News,  a parent’s complaint regarding “sexually explicit content” recently led to the removal of  “Merriam Webster Collegiate Dictionary” from schoolrooms teaching fourth and fifth grade children.*  The offensive content?

Oral sex – “oral stimulation of the genitals”

After review by a panel comprised of parents, teachers, and school administrators, the dictionaries have been returned to the classroom and students may access them only if their parents have signed a permission slip.

Does anyone else remember looking up the meaning of “dirty words” when you heard them?  I remember giggling with my friends during library time when we tried to find as many as possible in the time we were allotted (or before the teacher caught us).  I understand the urge to protect children, but by the time a child is in public school a few years, they’ve heard most “dirty words” countless times.  Because of this, wouldn’t it be prudent to allow children to learn the correct meaning of terms they are already hearing (and probably using), should they wish to know?

In other book banning news, FOX News reports this week a middle school in Virginia removed, “The Diary of a Young Girl: The Definitive Edition” by Anne Frank, after a complaint by a parent that the book contains “sexual references”.  The county’s Director of Instruction “didn’t want to make a big deal” out of the situation so he acted on the complaint by removing the book and replacing it with the originally published version, one censored by Anne’s father to remove the sexual content (among other things).

“The Diary of a Young Girl” has long been a reading assignment for many seventh or eighth grade students.**  It’s written by a 13-15 year old girl who endured the horrors of hiding for two years from the Nazis in a confined attic and who later died in Bergen-Belsen concentration camp.

I read the censored version of Anne’s diary when I was in school (although I didn’t know at the time it was censored).  It was powerful, it was frightening, it was real.  It’s true I didn’t suffer from the removal of Anne Frank’s innocent description of her vagina.  (She describes it without being crass and remarks she doesn’t see how a man fits in that little hole and she certainly doesn’t understand how a baby comes out.)   That said, I do not believe I would have been harmed by it either.  In fact, I know I wouldn’t have.

The same year I read “The Diary of a Young Girl”, we (most of the girls in my class) were passing around copies of “smut” books some had either bought or swiped from their mothers, books like “Sweet Savage Love” by Rosemary Rogers.  I assure you nothing an innocent girl could have written in her journal would have compared to the things described in books that fell open to all the naughty bits because the books had been opened to those pages so many times.

I will only add that I was a sheltered child.  Seriously sheltered.  My parental sex education consisted of  a set of books from Time Life that addressed the biology of sex and sexual maturation, and one sentence from my father.   “Yeah sex is good or everyone wouldn’t be doing it, but if you do it before you get married I’ll kill you.”   Sheltering didn’t help me, it only led me to alternative sources to satisfy my curiosity.

I understand and respect the opinions of people who are concerned about protecting their children, but quite often I think they must not remember what they or their friends were like when they are children.  Wouldn’t talking to your children be a much better way to address things we must all eventually learn?

~ ~

* Approximately ages 10-11

** Approximately ages 12-14

CBS Loves, Loves Not

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Loved (or at least ok by CBS standards):

An ad run by Focus on the Family, a Christian ministry whose purpose is “to strengthen, defend and celebrate the institution of the traditional family and to highlight the unique and irreplaceable role that it plays in God’s larger story of redemption”, will be aired during the Superbowl on February 7th.

Featuring “college football star Tim Tebow and his mother, Pam”, the ad “will share a personal story centered on the theme of ‘Celebrate Family, Celebrate Life.’ ”

I caught a glimpse of a portion of the ad on Headline News a few days ago, but could not as yet find it anywhere online. (If you do, please forward the URL.). Keeping it close til the day it airs may be a wise move by Focus as this will heighten the controversy and curiosity about the ad.  The clip I saw was a pro life ad, telling of Tebow’s mother’s choice not to abort him and what a wonderful choice that turned out to be.

Not loved by CBS, the following two ads that won’t be aired because CBS refused to sell Godaddy and Mancrunch the air time:

CBS has deemed it acceptable to permit one controversial ad and deny two. Is it discrimination, a savvy business decision, their right to do whatever they want, or something else? Are the ads (or the concept of the ads) offensive in your opinion? Do you agree with those who say the two rejected ads are too racy? Have you seen other aired Superbowl ads that were similarly “racy” but not as controversial?

I do believe the execs at Mancrunch and Godaddy are geniuses. Thanks to the internet, vast numbers of people are seeing their ads and talking about these issues with NO money going into the pocket of CBS. I consider CBS’ decision to be discriminatory. Personally, I have no problem with any of the three ads being run as I don’t have to accept everyone’s point of view simply because it is presented to me.

Oral Sex, Women in Combat, and The Englishman

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Nigel writes:

In October last year the Australian Military gave women unrestricted access to combat roles. On a personal level do you think that women should have the choice of serving in the infantry or do you think that soldiering is specifically a male occupation?

I do not believe any occupation should be limited to males. If a woman is able to pass all the criteria for joining – emotional, intellectual, and physical – then I believe she should be considered for a role in combat.

Humans, for whatever reason, seem to have a need for many things to be exclusive.  Women can’t do this, certain races can’t do that, and heaven forbid the homosexuals want to be included.  There are logical reasons why certain individuals cannot do specific things, but to exclude an entire group “just because it’s always been that way” is completely illogical to me.

Another reader asks:

Do you ever hear from the Englishman? Are you sorry you sent him away?

No, I haven’t heard anything else from him. Of course I am sad that part of my life is at an end and I am sorry to see him hurting, but it was over when he left the first time.  Just because something is painful doesn’t mean it isn’t the right thing for us to do.

Another reader commented:

My wife wants a female led relationship. I am ok with this but she wants me to be only oral to her.

I can only guess at your question here, so if I assume incorrectly, feel free to let me know.

The key to any healthy relationship is communication.  In my opinion there’s nothing about a female led relationship that suggests a man cannot tell his wife what he wants and needs.  He does, however, need to do so without manipulation and during a time that is acceptable to her.   Perhaps you could ask that she set aside a time when you may speak about some of your desires.  If, after sharing your need for more than oral sex, she declines, then I can see only a few options:  accept it, temporarily accept it and ask if you may revisit it at a later time,  ask if she would consider a reward system, or end the female led dynamic.  I realize some feel two of those options are “topping” but I don’t.  Discussing the wants and needs of both on a regular basis – at a time of her choosing, mind you – seems necessary for the health of the relationship.

Others may have different suggestions.  I trust they won’t be too shy to offer them :)

~ ~

Thank you for the questions :) If you would like to pose questions, you may do so anonymously here.

Interesting…

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Both images from Photosight.ru

Love the gorgeous red hair of the first model and the second model’s beautiful eyes.  I see no need to mention my fondness for the tush on the male ;)

Any thoughts on what statement these pieces are making?

Terrific Tush Tuesday for January 26th

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Hurry up summer! I’m ready for winter to be over.

A Quick Note

Monday, January 25th, 2010


I’ve been extra super busy today and will be tomorrow. Just leaving a note to those people who were expecting emails or phone calls so you won’t worry. I’ll catch up as soon as I can.

Fabulous Face Friday and a Few Questions

Friday, January 22nd, 2010


A friend asks,

I notice there is no link to the Silken Web on this page. I had forgotten about that site. I was wondering how the others knew about your other experience. Now I know. I usually start on your main page and use the links to go to your other pages. The Silken Web link would be helpful. I know. I know. I need to get an RSS reader going. On my list.

Actually, it was there, I just didn’t have it listed as The Silken Web. Why you couldn’t see it when I didn’t have it named correctly, I’ll never know ;) Thanks for the help.

He goes on to ask:

Are we ever a burden to you? In my mind, when you take control of something or someone you also are taking some responsibility. Do you see it that way? If so is that burdensome at times? So many people must write to you. I feel that maybe we take advantage of you at times. I realize these are personal questions. I will not be offended in any way if you do not answer.

Yes, taking control of something or someone is a responsibility that I take seriously. I wouldn’t say it is burdensome, rather it tends to make me really cautious. I try to be very careful how I phrase things and to remind people that their first responsibility is always to their every-day-life and their family. I think some people find repeats of that information a bit of a buzz kill, but such is life. I want to make sure that not only do I respect my responsibility to interact in a reasonable and safe manner, but that others remember their part in playing safely.

Some people try to take advantage, yes. It always amazes me how some of the most selfish people I’ve ever known profess to be submissives. I choose not to spend time interacting with people like that unless it is wholly unavoidable. I’m fortunate to have several really good friends both here and in my every day life.

The only stress I feel from my online activities is the stress I put on myself :) There simply aren’t enough hours to devote to it, especially as I have many things in my every day life that require my time. I have finally reached a point where I think my friends understand if I don’t respond quickly and those I don’t know will simply have to accept that as the case.

Thank you for the questions, my friend. If you or anyone else would like to pose questions, you may do so anonymously here.

Help For the People of Haiti

Friday, January 22nd, 2010


Powerful aftershocks continue to strike the country of Haiti.   As many as 200,000 people have died, while an estimated one million were injured. Many hospitals, homes, and vital services have been destroyed. An estimated total of 600,000 to 700,000 people are in need of food, water, shelter and medical care. (That’s approximately the size of the city of Baltimore proper.)

I’ve avoided blogging about this for a couple of reasons.  It’s receiving world wide coverage so I thought, what can I say that would influence people more than the images being flashed across their screens?  Also, it breaks my heart to think about all those poor people.  I selfishly thought I would make a donation and leave the fundraising to celebrities and the media.

I received a request from a friend that reminded me we must all try to do our part.  Perhaps you’ve already given.  Can you give again?  I’m going to skip some luxuries and give a little more, because I have things like a home, food, a soft bed, and medical care that so many Haitians – 40 percent of which are children under 15 years old – do not have.

I’m sure you have your charity of choice. If you need suggestions, here are a few of mine:

The Salvation Army International

The International Red Cross

UNICEF (United Nations International Children’s Fund)

Regardless if you can contribute monetarily, if you’re a praying person, please continue to remember these people. Long after the fickle attention of the media wanders, they will still be trying to sort out the broken pieces of their lives.

Thank you for listening and for any help you can offer.

“Simple Dominance” Site – Not Just For The Ladies

Friday, January 22nd, 2010


I hear you milling around in the bathroom, surreptitiously attempting to catch a peek at my body as I shower. Smiling, I wonder if I should pull you into the shower and take you right there, or if I should leave you where you are, wanting and aching.

Taking you. I’ve never been really good at denying that urge even if I am in the midst of denying your cock any pleasure.

Finish Reading “Step Into the Shower, Pet”.